Books and tea on a delightfully Springy morning...

I’m listening to the birdsong through the open windows this morning as I sip my chai tea and think about books.  I’m using a new mug today, one I bought from that pottery place in St Jacob’s where I got my original “Sunday morning chai tea” mug.  This one is large and meant for soup, but I couldn’t wait to try it out!

I’m not quite finished a new book by Canadian sci-fic author, award-winning Robert J Sawyer called Quantum Night.  This fast-paced page-turner tells the story of Professor Jim Marchuk, a psychologist who has developed the perfect test indicating the psychopathy that is lurking everywhere in society.  When he is called to be an expert witness at the trial of a murderer in the southern United States, he is shocked to learn that not only was extreme violence practiced by a not-too-distant relative, but that he has a period of missing memory, about six months, during his university days.  His search for this missing time leads him to discover that he was part of a top-secret experiment for the US Department of Defense and experienced adverse reactions to the testing which not only caused him to lose any memory of that time, but to also exhibit a totally different personality, a much more violent one.  When he reconnects with Kayla, an old girlfriend from this missing time, he discovers that there are three distinct types of personalities, based on an individual’s quantum superposition (whatever that means!  he did explain it fully in the book, but I didn’t fully understand it even at the time of reading, and now it’s days later).  These personalities are Q1 - philosopher’s zombies or “p-zeds”, Q2 - psychopaths, and Q3 - fully functioning individuals, with a conscience, and Kayla’s team have created a test that can accurately identify these personality types. There is the added discovery of a tool that can change a person’s superposition (thanks for the nod to the Perimeter Institute, Robert!).  With the ability to determine which individuals would be most likely to follow instructions, and the ability also to change people’s personalities, Sawyer explores many moral and ethical scenarios that are set in the very-near future, but so realistic is his portrayal of these scenarios that he’s got this reader wondering if these are possibilities that exist right now!  I’m not finished the book yet, and so, with more than a third of the book left to read (last week was super-busy), I can’t really comment on the novel as a whole, but it’s definitely got me thinking about how consciously I’m engaging in my life, and wondering if I’m a p-zed, just wandering through life, following routines and not really thinking consciously about my life and the things around me.  I like to think that I have a “rich inner life” and that I can “think outside the box”, but look at how easily we fall back on clichés.  It’s so far a really thought-provoking novel, and a fast-paced thriller that is keeping me interested to reach the final page.  I’m not always thrilled with the way he uses the novel as an opportunity for “product placement” (he clearly loves Apple products!), nor do I enjoy the parts where the author is so obviously using the book to get on his soapbox; not that the issues he’s addressing are unimportant, just that he could have done it in a subtler way that made me feel as though he believes his readers have enough intelligence to understand what he’s saying.  I felt that much of the book was like this, that he “dumbed it down” so everyone would understand.  I guess this is so that his book would have wider appeal, not just to sci-fi readers, but to readers of any genre.  I also don’t know exactly what the book is really about, what the main story is.  There are so many storylines that seem underdeveloped that I’m curious if the real point to the story, the main plot, will become apparent in the last third.  I’ll let you know next week what my rating would be, but for now, I would recommend it to just about anyone, as it’s a fast-paced, easy read that is also very thought-provoking.  

And I finally finished listening to Robert Galbraith’s Career of Evil, once again narrated by Robert Glenister.  This is the third book in the Cormoran Strike series and it was just about as good as the first one, which was awesome, and significantly better than the second one, which was not very good, in my opinion.   Glenister is the narrator for all three books, which is great, as he’s got the characters’ personalities and voices down pat.  This novel begins with Robin frantically arranging for her upcoming wedding.  Having completed the surveillance course recommended by Strike, she is now getting out of the office more and working longer hours, even on weekends, with no pay increase, which is something fiancé Matthew is not thrilled about.  She is finding that it’s easier to receive personal deliveries at work rather than at home, so when a box shows up one morning, she readily signs for it, thinking her wedding favours have arrived.  Inside the office, she is shocked to find that the box contains not disposable cameras, but a woman’s severed leg.  Strike contacts Wardle, the police detective least vexed by Strike’s triumph over the police in the second book, Silkworm, and informs him that he believes the leg was meant for him, not Robin, as the card included with the leg contained the quotation from the Blue Oyster Cult song, Mistress of the Salmon Salt, that Strike’s mother had tattooed on her lower abdomen.  References to Blue Oyster Cult songs lead into most chapters and sections of the book, as the killer is obsessed with this classic rock band.  Strike puts forth three likely candidates as suspects, men from his past who would want to ruin his business and who would also be capable of such cold-blooded acts as sending severed body parts to him via courier.  The police, not surprisingly, don’t really listen to his suggestions, and follow their own leads.  Strike, then, is forced to investigate on his own.  Despite Strike’s protestations that he wants Robin to follow specific safety precautions, she persists in conducting her own lines of inquiry with these suspects, particularly paedophile Noel Brockbank, while also taking an active role in assisting Strike in his own investigations.  These investigations leads them all over the country, digging into the pasts and searching for the current whereabouts for these unsavoury suspects.  Robin, meanwhile, is conflicted about marrying Matthew, and her attraction to Strike simmers just below the surface, feelings which are reciprocated by Strike.  Of course, it is a complex plot with plenty of nasty characters, and the sexual tension between Robin and Strike is ever-present, which in my opinion somewhat detracts from the story rather than adding to it.  And the ending, which I was so anticipating, felt rather flat and rushed, and left many things unresolved. Still, it was overall a great listening experience.  If you enjoyed the first two in this series, I’m sure you will enjoy this one, too.  I’d give the first book, Cuckoo’s Calling a 10 out of 10, the second, Silkworm, a 7 out of 10, and this third a 9.  It needs no additional promotion, as I'm sure this series has a huge fan following.  I wonder why, now that everyone knows who is really writing these novels, Rowling continues to publish under the pseudonym Galbraith?  

That’s all for today.  Get outside and enjoy the beautiful Spring weather!

Bye for now…
Julie

PS Don't forget the big CFUW Annual Book Sale next weekend: http://cfuwkw.org/index.php?page=annual-used-book-sale

Tea and books on a chilly Sunday morning...

It’s been well below seasonal temperatures this week, and today is no exception, so I really appreciate my hot tea as I compose my weekly post.

I read a surprisingly good book this week by Canadian author Liam Durcan, The Measure of Darkness, which tells the story of a man in midlife who, due to an accident that has left him with a condition called “neglect”, is trying to maintain control and order in his life while also recollecting his past behaviour.  Martin is a fairly successful architect in Montreal who, while sitting in his parked car on the side of a highway one February night, is hit by a snowplow, causing serious neurological damage and leaving him with “left neglect”, a condition under which he is unable to have an awareness of anything taking place in the left side of his vision.  He not only can’t see what is there, he is not even aware that it exists - he thinks he has clear vision of his whole world, and does not experience any feelings of deficiency.  His estranged brother, Brendan, whom Martin has encountered only briefly twice in the past thirty years, has arranged to have him treated at the Dunes, a prestigious rehabilitation centre in Vermont, although Martin has no idea why he would do such a thing.  Over the years, he has also become estranged from his daughters, as well as his two ex-wives, and there are details concerning the recent decisions involving the architectural firm he founded that he can’t seem to recall.  One by one, secrets and details are revealed as Martin’s life comes into focus for him, his brother and the reader, as we are led ever closer to solving the mystery surrounding the reason Martin was out on the side of that deserted highway in the middle of a snowstorm.  Interwoven into the story is Martin’s obsession with Russian architect Konstantin Melnikov, a non-conformist in the early 20th century, who served as an inspiration to Martin and set him on the road to becoming the architect he is.  Unable to continue his work with his condition, he must decide how to move forward with his future, which can only be achieved by looking back at his past.  I had zero expectations for this book, so was very pleasantly surprised at how captivating a read it was.  I was worried that there might be too many details and too much medical terminology describing his condition.  I was also worried that, given the main character's obsession with this Russian architect, there might be too much description of Melnikov’s life and work, but thankfully, my worries were for naught.  In fact, these two aspects of the novel were, if anything, underdeveloped, but not in ways that seriously impacted the story.  This short novel was surprisingly insightful (no pun intended!), and there were moments of brilliance that made it a really worthwhile read.  My only complaint was that there were quite a few errors in the text, not typos or spelling mistakes, but words that were repeated or left out, maybe five or six times throughout the book - not serious enough to impede the story, just mildly irritating.  I’d give this book 7.5 out of 10, and would recommend it to anyone who enjoys reading novels that explore the human condition and feature main characters who explore their past in order to better understand their present situation.

I also want to mention that the Canadian Federation of University Women (CFUW) Annual Book Sale will be held on April 22nd and 23rd in Waterloo - it is a wonderful opportunity to stock up on good books very cheaply while also supporting a worthy cause. Check out this link for more information:

http://cfuwkw.org/index.php?page=annual-used-book-sale

That’s all for today.  I think it will be a good “stay-at-home-and-read” day - HURRAY!!

Bye for now…
Julie

Books and tea on a chilly April morning...

Oh boy, it’s a very different look outside from just a few mild days ago - it’s a winter wonderland of fluffy snow and bright sun and chilly chilly temperatures.  But I’m cozy inside with my steaming cup of chai tea and a slice of freshly baked Date Bread as I think about what I’ve recently read.

Since my last post, I managed to read two books.  As it was just before Easter, I picked up my favourite book to reread, The Winter of Our Discontent by John Steinbeck.  Every year at this time, I have the urge to reread this book, as it opens with the main character waking up on Good Friday.  A significant portion of the book happens over the Easter weekend, when exchanges occur that drive the rest of the book’s events.  I didn’t read it last year, but this year, because I have much more free reading time, I indulged and enjoyed it as much this time as I did on every other reading.  As I wrote in an earlier post (February 23 2014), Steinbeck infuses this novel with so much wisdom, so many insightful comments on the "human condition", that I could write an essay about something pertinent he addresses on just about every page.  This novel tells the story of the loss of innocence of Ethan Allen Hawley, descendant of a proud New England family whose family once owned half of New Baytown but whose father, through bad advice and bad choices, lost everything, with the result that Ethan is now a clerk in a grocery store his family once owned.  This store is now owned by Alfio Marullo, a man who came from Sicily decades earlier, but is still considered a “foreigner”.  When one unusual occurrence is followed by  another and yet another in rapid succession, Ethan is compelled to change himself, to dare himself to become what he thinks others want him to be, regardless of his innately strong moral fiber and his belief in personal truth and accountability.  It is the picture of small-town life, and the exploration of the dynamics that work behind the facades of even the most benign-looking settings and groups.  Ethan speaks directly to the reader, and we are drawn into the journey, the exploration, the insidious corruption that steals up on him and sends him spiraling downward, so that there is no specific point at which we can say, “Here is where he went wrong, here is the point at which he betrayed himself and finally achieved the status he thought he wanted, but at what cost?”  It is difficult to describe this book, because not much actually happens.  It deals more with the deterioration of one man’s soul to fulfill the expectations others have of him.  It is a cautionary tale that reminds readers to be careful what we wish for because we just might get it, and that sometimes the treasure we seek is already all around us.  For juvenile fiction, we would call this a “coming-of-age” novel, where we would refer to the “loss of innocence” of the main character.  I don’t know if there are comparable terms that refer to adult literature, since loss of innocence is generally associated with youth, and surely Ethan has already come of age by the time this story begins.  It was like Catcher in the Rye for adults - the reader wants him to hold on to the golden ring and not become corrupted, just as Holden Caulfield wants Phoebe to retain her childhood innocence.  I can’t praise this book enough.  Clearly, I would give it a 10 out of 10.

And my volunteer book group met yesterday to discuss Plainsong by Kent Haruf.  This book has been compared to The Winter of Our Discontent, and now that I’ve read it, I can see some similarities.  Plainsong is set in the small fictional town of Holt, Colorado, and describes the lives of these central characters: Tom Guthrie, the high school History teacher, and his estranged wife, Ella; Ike and Bobby, Tom’s sons, aged nine and ten; Maggie Jones, another teacher at the high school who lives with her elderly father; Victoria Roubideaux, a high school student who is pregnant and determined to keep the baby; and Harold and Raymond McPherson, two elderly bachelor brothers who run a farm just outside of town, and who end up giving Victoria a place to stay when her mother kicks her out.   These characters’ lives are intertwined as only the lives of those in a small town can be - everyone knows everything about everyone else.  Tom faces challenges at home and at work - his wife is suffering from some unnamed mental health issues, and he must take on the responsibility of raising his sons alone.  There are issues with one of his students, a boy who has caused problems throughout his school history, and one whom the principal just wants to graduate and move him along to become someone else’s problem.  Unfortunately, Tom refuses to pass him until he makes an effort to hand in some work.  When Victoria’s mother discovers her pregnancy and locks her out of the house, she is left to wander the streets until she turns up at the home of one of her teachers, Maggie, asking for some help.  She stays at Maggie’s place until Maggie’s father, suffering from Alzheimer’s, scares her into leaving.  Maggie approaches the brothers and suggests that Victoria live with them, that having her there would help them as much as it would help her.  They are, of course, reluctant at first, but then they embrace the idea and welcome her into their home as best they can.  When Dwayne, the father of Victoria’s baby, shows up at school one day, she goes off with him to live in Denver, but it doesn’t work out the way she was hoping, so she returns to the farm, where she is once again welcomed.  Ike and Bobby are two responsible boys who deliver newspapers to the whole town every day before school.  They also collect money each week, where they encounter interesting townsfolk, including Mrs Stearns, an elderly, reclusive woman whom they at first dread visiting, but whom they eventually come to like.  Tom’s wife, Ella, moves from the darkened guest room in their house to a rental place in town, and eventually to Denver, where she is staying with her sister.  The boys visit her regularly, but there is really not much hope that Tom and she will get back together.  Tom then begins dating Maggie.  There is really no plot to this novel, and at the end, many storylines are left unresolved, but there is a sequel, Eventide, which may answer some of the questions readers are left with.   Three members showed up for the meeting, and one member loved this book right from the first page.  She said she connected with the characters right away and she sped through the book, which was unusual for her.  She appreciated the stark language the author used to describe the events in the town.  One member said she felt irritated by Haruf’s writing style at first, with the lengthy sentences describing the minutiae of daily life, but that it didn’t take long for her, too, to be sucked in by the story.  And the other member read it some time ago and didn’t love it, didn’t hate it - she thought it was just ok.  The ladies who loved it grew up on farms in small towns, so they could really relate to the characters and the settings - they said many of the scenes reminded them of their own experiences growing up.  One member talked about her experiences collecting money for her paper route.  I read aloud a favourite scene when the boys are sent by Mrs Stearns to the grocery store to buy ingredients for oatmeal cookies, and they remark that it was more complicated than it seems - two kinds of brown sugar, two kinds of oatmeal in two different sizes, and two colours of eggs in three different sizes - Oh my!  How are they to choose?  One of the ladies said she could relate, as she would often be sent in to do the grocery shopping for the whole family at a young age, and she remembers how confusing it was.  As I was reading the novel, I wondered when it was set;  it was published in 1999 but there was no mention of any sort of technology, no internet, no social media, and the idea of collecting newspaper money seemed archaic somehow, yet it also seemed somehow fairly current.  After some discussion, we determined that it was probably set sometime in the 1980s, before computers became so prevalent. We discussed how realistic the situation with the two brothers was, that back in the day, it was not uncommon to find households and farms run by aged bachelor brothers, and even some run by spinster sisters in small towns and farming communities. We talked about how things have changed regarding raising children, how kids were given so much more responsibility and freedom in our day, and how so much is done for them nowadays.  We thought that if kids are given responsibility and challenges, they grow to be more resilient, and that being too over-protective can be detrimental to a child’s development.  One member liked that this was like reading about “normal people”, which echoed my thought that this book is like a little slice of ordinary life.  As well as The Winter of Our Discontent, this book also reminded me of Empire Falls by Richard Russo, which I read a couple of months ago.  I would give the book a rating of 8, and I’d like to read the sequel to find out what happened to the characters.

That’s all for today.  Get outside and enjoy the sunshine, but make sure to bundle up!!

Bye for now…
Julie

Post on an icy cold morning...

It’s a cold, icy day just before Easter weekend, and the schools are closed, so I decided to take advantage of this “found time” to write my blog.  It’s supposed to be beautiful and sunny on the weekend, and if my weekly post is done, I will have more time to play!  I definitely appreciate my steaming cup of chai this morning as the wind blows the icy branches and whistles through the cracks in the doors, but I’ve got CBC Radio 2 to keep me company as I think about the past week’s readings.

I have a book and an audiobook to tell you about.  The book is The Child Garden by Catriona McPherson, a title I discovered after reading a review in the local paper.  The library didn’t have it yet, but I put in a Suggestion for Purchase and they bought it.  Set in the Scottish highlands, this book opens in 1985 with something nasty taking place in the woods: we’re not sure what is happening but we know it’s bad.  Fast-forward 28 years and meet Gloria Harkness, a middle-aged woman, divorced, with a job, a son, a house and a dog.  Her life is pretty predictable and uneventful, so when she hears a knock on her door late one night and finds an old friend from her school days on her doorstep, she does not turn her back on the opportunity to have a bit of an adventure.  Stephen “Stig” Tarrant asks for Gloria’s help in stopping a woman, April Cowan, from stalking him.  April and Stig were classmates at Eden, an alternative high school that was established by Stig’s parents nearly 30 years before, but was closed after just one year because of a student suicide, a drowning in the river under a bridge near the school during a whole-school outdoor sleep-over on May Day.  April has contacted Stig all these years later claiming that it wasn’t suicide, but murder, and tries to meet with him.  When she doesn’t show up for the meeting, Stig thinks this is the end of it, but then receives several more messages.  Stig seeks Gloria’s help because she lives nearby the old school grounds, which have now been converted to a home for the elderly and infirm.  When they head out together to the latest meeting spot, they discover April’s dead body, another suicide.  Could this be the result of her guilt at hiding the truth about the first death for so many years?  But when it is established that April was murdered, Stig is placed firmly in the frame and he must stay hidden at Gloria’s farmhouse if he is to avoid police custody.  When Gloria investigates other former students from Eden, she is amazed at her discoveries, and as one case follows another, the story becomes more complex than anything she or Stig could have imagined.  Will they be able to discover who is behind these murders before they, too, are added to the list of victims?  I have never read anything by this author, although she has written quite a number of previous books, mainly a historical mystery series featuring Dandy Gilver.  This standalone was a bit confusing and vague at first, but once I got over that and learned to just “go with the flow”, it kept me riveted to the very end.  The characters were flawed but believable, and I certainly felt for Gloria’s plight as she dealt with the various difficult situations in her life.  And the suspense was real - I could feel my heart racing as she uncovered case after case and pieced together the puzzle that would lead to a final, satisfying conclusion.  It was certainly not as polished as a psychological mystery by Minette Walters or Peter Robinson, but it was still a good book, and I’m definitely going to try another of her standalones - in fact, I’ve just put in a library request for The Day She Died.  You’ll like this book if you enjoy complex mysteries that involve family secrets from the past.  I think I’ll start giving books ratings out of 10:  This book is a 7.5 out of 10.

And I finished listening to an audiobook a couple of days ago, another mystery by British author Reginald Hill, most famous for his “Dalziel and Pascoe” series. Who Guards a Prince features Douglas McHarg, former member of the Queen's Guard who once guarded Prince Arthur, a minor British prince, and who is now a detective with Scotland Yard.  With the discovery of a severed tongue on a beach by a doctor out walking with his young daughter, a complex mystery is set in motion involving freemasons, a wealthy Irish patriarch in Boston, and a forbidden romance.  As bodies pile up, McHarg must work fast and travel far to uncover the dark secrets and hidden truths even as he is warned off the case by his superiors and targeted by the most influential men.  I thought I’d try this book out as I’m interested in mysteries dealing with secret societies (long before the publication of The Da Vinci Code!)  It was pretty good, and the narrator did a wonderful job of bringing the tough McHarg to life.  It was complex and interesting, and the whole bit about the Freemasons was enlightening, though not as informative as I had hoped (I guess that’s why it’s a “secret” society!)  I didn’t know this was also part of a series, so I may try to find other audiobooks in this series, or others by Hill in the “Dalziel and Pascoe” series.  Not brilliant, but not a bad book, I would give it a 7 out of 10.

Happy Easter, everyone! May this holiday offer you peace and joy and maybe even a glimpse of the Easter bunny!  

Bye for now…
Julie

Books and tea on the first day of Spring...

It’s a bright, gorgeous, brisk, sunny morning as I sip my steaming chai and think about the books I’ve read over the past week.  Since it was March Break, I had planned to read at least three books, but managed to finish only two.

The first book I read is a Silver Birch fiction nominee called Speechless by Jennifer Mook-Sang.  It tells the story of Joe “Jelly” Miles, an average grade 6 student who would rather be playing video games with his friend Parker “P.B.” than preparing for a school speech competition.  But when he sees what this year’s prize is, a brand new tablet computer with all the accessories, he is convinced to take it seriously.  Class know-it-all and mean-girl Victoria goads him on, and he is more determined than ever to win the competition, but for a very different reason.  When nasty rumours begin to fly, Jelly has to be creative to debunk them while still maintaining his integrity.  He is also coaxed into helping out P.B.’s sister at the local food bank, where he discovers hidden talents, new friends and much about his community.  When the final competition day arrives, will Jelly have the courage to stand up in front of the whole school and do his best to win, while still holding on to what he truly believes in?  This book has everything you could want to find in a book geared to readers in grades 4-6:  it has a male protagonist, but there is a “love story”, too, so it would appeal to both girls and boys.  It’s funny, and easy to read, and has a strong message about values and friendship and community initiatives.  And there are lots of scenes with video games!  What more could a reader want?!  I really enjoyed this book, and would highly recommend it to readers of any age as a fun read that still manages to address serious topics.

And I read a recently published novel by Canadian author Billie Livingston, The Crooked Heart of Mercy.  This novel tells the story of three characters who are all bound together by tragic circumstances:  Maggie, a young mother who has recently lost her toddler son, Frankie, and is trying to get her life back together; Ben, Maggie’s husband, whose life spirals out of control after the loss of Frankie and ends up in a psyche ward after shooting himself in the head; and Maggie’s brother, Francis, a passionate priest who is an occasional alcoholic, occasionally celibate, and gay.  Maggie had worked as a housecleaner and companion for elderly clients before Frankie’s death.  When the bills pile up and she re-enters the workforce after the tragedy, one of her new clients is Lucy, an 80-year-old widow who becomes increasingly reliant on Maggie for companionship.  When Maggie asks if she wouldn’t like her to vacuum or do the dishes instead of just sitting with her, Lucy replies that some rich guy once said, “You don’t get paid by the hour.  You get paid for the value you bring to the hour.”  I loved this quotation, because it helped Maggie to begin to see that she is still a valuable person, despite the guilt she suffers over the death of her son.  Her life still has meaning and purpose, just different from before.  Francis also needs to find his way, his true calling, and the strength to manage his passions, both religious and secular.  And Ben must also overcome the guilt he feels over the tragedy and find a way to begin anew.  Together, these three characters must support each other and somehow find a way to keep on living, in the face of tragedy and adversity.  This short novel was heartbreaking and yet uplifting, and offered insight into the thoughts of these three very different and yet very believable characters.  I found Ben’s character the most challenging, and Francis’ story the most touching, but they all work together to give this novel complexity, dark humour and diversity.  I would recommend this to just about anyone who enjoys a tragic story with an uplifting ending.  

That’s all for today.  Get outside and enjoy the sunshine!

Bye for now…
Julie

Afternoon post for a change...

It’s late afternoon as I write this post.  I’ve got a cup of tea and a slice of freshly baked Banana Bread, and I’m thinking about what I will read this coming week, as it is March Break and I will have plenty of extra reading time.

I just finished a book this morning that my Friends book group will be discussing tomorrow night, Ruby by Cynthia Bond.  This novel, set in the small town of Liberty, Texas in the 1960s, tells the story of Ruby Bell, a woman who grew up in Liberty, only to escape to New York in search of her mother when she was in her teens.  She has returned to the town after many years, and the townspeople and church members waste no time trying to break her spirit once again, just as they had before she escaped when she was young, motherless and completely vulnerable.  The reader is left to decide if she is mad, or just hypersensitive to the guilt and grief of the spirits and “haints” surrounding her in the forest around the Bell property.  When Ephram Jennings, the man who has carried a torch for Ruby since childhood, arrives and tries to reach out to her, Ruby pushes him away, only to be met with insistence, gentleness and love.  But Ephram’s pious sister, Celia, has other plans for her rogue brother, and we are offered their stories and their struggles, and Ephram must decide between loyalty towards his sister, who raised him like a son, and love for Ruby, who may never be able to accept or return it.  Thrown into this mix are scenes of superstition and voodoo, and horrifying details that surrounded Ruby and others like her growing up in this small town where even white girls are offered up as pawns, all for the purpose of making money.  This book was recommended by one of the book club members, but she warned us that there were descriptive scenes of rape and violence.  I, too, would advise any reader that there are disturbing sections of this book, and not just one or two, but many, many lengthy scenes, which seemed excessive to me, but this book was an Oprah choice and got rave reviews.  I didn’t love it, and struggled to get through it, but thankfully, all was explained near the end.  The author used a dreamlike style for much of the book, which was both vague and often confusing - I think chapter headings with dates and locations would have been helpful.  This style was also used in another book I read fairly recently, Birdie by Tracy Lindberg. Both books dealt with the sexual abuse of young girls, mental illness, and superstition, spiritual awakening or magic realism. Both are debut novels and, while I preferred Lindberg’s book, clearly from the reviews others felt that Bond’s novel was also well-written and praiseworthy.  I’m curious to hear what the others in my group thought of this book.

That’s all for now - I’m not used to writing so late, and it’s strange to be ending this post because I have to make something for dinner.  I promise that for the next post, things will be back to normal.  Happy March Break!

Bye for now…
Julie

Tea and books on a bright, clear day

It is another lovely day, although still chilly, but we’re expected to have unseasonably high temperatures for the next 10 days or so.  It’s not too warm to enjoy a hot cup of tea, though, and that is just what I’m doing!

Well, the cats have continued to cause issues that take up valuable reading time, so I just finished the book club selection, Life After Life by Kate Atkinson on Friday night.  Here’s a brief plot summary:  the main character, Ursula Todd, born in 1910 in the English countryside, meets an unfortunate end before she even has a chance for her life to begin… until her life begins again, and she survives, only to meet an unfortunate end as a very young girl… and then her life begins again, and she learns to survive a little bit longer, until she once again meets an unfortunate end… and so on, and so on, and so on…  I didn’t think I was going to enjoy this book, as I prefer more linear stories - some flashbacks are ok, if they help to develop the story or characters, but not too many, as I find they become distracting.  But since this book was so wildly popular, and so much in demand, I decided to put it on the list so we’d all be forced to read it.  And it was a very successful book choice indeed!  We all agreed that we were glad we read it, and that it was one we were discussing, because we all got more out of the book after hearing the views of others.  We talked about the main character, Ursula, and what it would be like to have this ability, this sixth sense, to know what was going to happen, or not really “know”, but have a glimmer of the future, and also be able to make choices that will change your own path as well as the paths of others.  As we discussed the other characters, and whose personalities remained consistent throughout Ursula’s various incarnations, we wondered if she is the only one to whom this is happening, if perhaps others are experiencing this as well.  Ursula is not choosing to do this, it is just happening to her, and it’s not reincarnation, where she comes back in another place or time as another creature, but it is the same little girl coming back to live the same life, although she has the ability to change things slightly, but then she doesn’t have the foresight to know how these changes will affect the future of her life and the lives of others.  She’s basically learning from her mistakes, but then she applies different tactics to the very same situations, which lead to other issues - “Re-experiencing life again for the first time” is how we summed it up.  When we considered whether other characters had this ability, we thought that there were suggestions that Sylvie (the mother) and Teddy (the favourite brother) may have been more receptive to these insights, while Maurice (the elder brother), Izzy (the disgraced aunt), Pamela (the elder sister) and Hugh (the father) did not have this insight, that they just “lived”.  We considered Ursula’s various lives, considering which ones were preferable to others, and which ones were the worst possible fates for her.  I mentioned that, since I knew that Ursula would die at the end of each section and then be reborn into the same life, and that most sections were fairly short-ish, when I did encounter rather longer sections, I found myself looking ahead to find when the darkness would fall so we could start again - I was rather impatient with all the detail in the longer sections.  So I guess I fell into the rhythm of the book’s structure:  whereas at first I found the short sections and the repetition a bit frustrating, by the middle of the book, it was working for me.  I was reassured to hear that I was not the only one who was looking ahead in the book for the next point at which our main character would die!  We were all somewhat disappointed by the ending - one member said she found it a bit “flat” - but after discussing it, we decided that it was really the only way Atkinson could have ended the book, that it wasn’t really an ending, that yet another incarnation could be about to begin, just beyond the last page.  We were all glad to have read it because it made each of us think about the randomness of life, and the coincidences that shape how it turns out.  We thought about free will and choice, and how we may be able to control our own choices, but have little control over the actions of others.  One member said that she read it quite quickly, which she found worked to keep herself oriented with the story’s variations, and I would have to agree; I, unfortunately, read it in short snippets over two weeks, and found it very difficult to keep track.  The details about life in both Germany and England during WWII were horrifying and enlightening (the sights, the sounds, the smells, the pressure when a bomb exploded), and the smattering of German words and phrases used throughout the book were accurate (one member lived in Germany for years and was checking for mistakes!).  So all in all, it was a lively, interesting meeting and I would definitely recommend this book if you are looking for something for your own book club.  I would also recommend discussing the book with someone if you are reading it on your own, or at least looking for reviews or discussions online, as it really enhances the meaning and power of the book’s structure and message to hear the thoughts of others.

OK, that’s it for today.  Get outside and enjoy the sunshine!

Bye for now…
Julie

PS I just got back from a long walk and finished my audiobook, The Husband's Secret by Liane Moriarty. It was awesome (to find out more about it, you can check out the blog entry I wrote some time ago when I read the book). Anyway, I wanted to mention it here because the way she ends the book talks about the coincidences that shape the direction our lives take, which I had forgotten about and which fits with the book we discussed yesterday. Both authors used some humour in their books, too, although Moriarty's book was funnier than Atkinson's.

And I wanted to share something I read on a sign outside a cafe yesterday, after spending hours trying to get chores done and desperately wanting a coffee: "A yawn is a silent scream for coffee". I love that! (I never did get my coffee... sad...)